Al Arrab Contracting Co. Ltd.
Al Arrab Contracting Co. Ltd. appealed a government motion for partial summary judgment regarding entitlement for delays in a contract for school construction in Saudi Arabia. The Board denied the government's motion, allowing the appeal to proceed.
Material Facts
- Al Arrab Contracting Co. Ltd. was awarded a contract on 21 January 2006 for the construction of three school buildings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- The contract required completion of the buildings within 730 days by 4 February 2008.
- Construction was completed on or before 30 June 2012, with contract completion date extended to 31 August 2012 through ten bilateral modifications and two unilateral modifications.
- None of the bilateral modifications contained an express reservation by appellant of rights to file claims for delays.
- The modifications included price adjustments of limited scope, and the government assured the appellant that it would consider a future delay/impact claim.
- ACC submitted a total cost claim on 1 July 2012 seeking compensation for project delay costs.
- The contracting officer issued an initial final decision on the claim on 25 September 2012 and an amended final decision on 17 June 2013, both addressing the merits of ACC's claim.
Parties
- Appellant
- Al Arrab Contracting Co. Ltd.
- Respondent Agency
- Army
- Contract Number
- W90BRJ-06-C-0016
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- John C. Grimberg Co., Inc.No. 58791, 59717January 2, 2019
- John C. Grimberg Co., Inc.No. 58791, 59167, 59168, 59169, 59170, 59171, 59717October 25, 2018
- CANVS CorporationNo. 57784, 57987September 6, 2018
- K&K Industries, Inc.No. 61189September 5, 2018
- Northrop Grumman CorporationNo. 60190January 9, 2018
- Nelson, Inc.No. 57201, 58166November 8, 2017
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
- Korte Construction CompanyNo. 63539, 63540September 30, 2026
- GiaMed Alliance JV, LLCNo. 64484September 29, 2026