5856858845

Tetra Tech Facilities Construction, LLC

November 15, 2016Judge O'Sullivan
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedDiffering Site ConditionsEquitable Adjustment (REA)Quantum / DamagesSuperior Knowledge

Tetra Tech Facilities Construction, LLC appealed the denial of its certified claim for an equitable adjustment arising from saturated, unstable subsurface soils encountered during construction. The Board sustained entitlement under the Type I differing site conditions clause and remanded the appeal for determination of quantum.

Material Facts

  • The contract was a two-phase design-build procurement for renovation and expansion of the Maryland Army Aviation Support Facility at Aberdeen Proving Ground.
  • The contract incorporated the FAR 52.236-2, DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS clause.
  • The government-provided Giles Report described generally firm, stiff, medium, or constructible soils and estimated the water table at approximately 7 to 11 feet below ground.
  • The bidders were limited to visual observations during the pre-bid site visit, and invasive investigation was not allowed.
  • During excavation south of Column Line 9, Tetra Tech encountered saturated, unstable, pumping soils that required remediation.
  • The project included a leaking fire hydrant, a leaking water valve or water main outside the limits of disturbance, and two perforated storm drainage pipes.
  • The leaking infrastructure was not disclosed to Tetra Tech or the bidders in the solicitation documents.
  • Tetra Tech used undercutting and backfill, soil cementing, temporary access roads, and related geotechnical services to address the unsuitable soils.
  • The government denied the existence of differing site conditions and asserted that Tetra Tech should have anticipated shallow groundwater and implemented extensive dewatering.
  • Modification No. P00003 funded a change from a spread-footing foundation to a deep foundation for the hangar addition.
  • Tetra Tech submitted an REA and later a claim seeking compensation for soil-remediation and related costs.
  • The contracting officer denied the claim, and the Board consolidated Tetra Tech's two appeals.

Parties

Appellant
Tetra Tech Facilities Construction, LLC
Respondent Agency
United States Army Property and Fiscal Office (USPFO)
Contracting Agency
United States Army Property and Fiscal Office (USPFO)
Contract Number
W912K6-09-C-0002
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.