Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc.
Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc. sought compensation for additional costs under a firm fixed-price contract with the Navy, claiming defective specifications and differing site conditions. The ASBCA denied the appeals, finding Skanska should have anticipated the conditions.
Material Facts
- The contract was a firm fixed-price design-bid-build project for the demolition of Piers 4 and 5 and construction of a new pier at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard.
- Skanska claimed additional costs due to the removal of interior timber bearing piles not treated with creosote.
- The Navy's solicitation instructed bidders to assume the timber piles were creosote-treated.
- Skanska argued that the lack of creosote treatment constituted a differing site condition or defective specification.
- The Navy awarded the contract to Skanska on September 29, 2010, for $164,321,000.
- The contract required Skanska to completely extract and demolish all timber piles.
Parties
- Appellant
- Skanska USA Civil Southeast, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Navy
- Contract Number
- N40085-10-C-3006
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Dashti Sanat Logistics and General ContractingNo. 63643August 11, 2026
- Warrior Construction Services, Inc.No. 64497August 7, 2026
- MPG WestNo. 61100-ADR, 61560-ADR, 61570-ADRJuly 24, 2026
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc.No. 63773-ADR, 63831-ADR, 63853-ADR, 63854-ADR, 63855-ADR, 63856-ADR, 63857-ADRJune 22, 2026
- NES Pacific Limited Liability Co.No. 63710-EAJAJune 16, 2026
Same Year
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.No. 60979December 30, 2025
- Kallidus TechnologiesNo. 61377, 61976December 18, 2025
- Warfighter Defense, Inc.No. 63908, 63909December 11, 2025
- Targe Logistic Services CompanyNo. 63282December 10, 2025
- K2 Solutions, Inc.No. 62768December 9, 2025
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64307December 8, 2025
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Warrior Construction Services, Inc.No. 64497August 7, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p.A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428July 16, 2026