59297

Symetrics Industries, LLC

August 13, 2015Judge McIlmail
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedDefective Pricing / TINADCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Symetrics Industries, LLC appealed a contracting officer's final decision asserting defective pricing under a firm-fixed-price contract for modem units. The Board sustained the appeal, holding that the government failed to prove that Symetrics did not disclose the forward pricing rate proposal rates within the meaning of the Truth in Negotiations Act.

Material Facts

  • The Department of the Army awarded Symetrics a letter contract for production of 295 Improved Data Modem 304 units.
  • Symetrics submitted a firm-fixed-price proposal for the units.
  • DCAA audited Symetrics's price proposal, and DCAA Auditor Sherry Hepfner conducted the audit.
  • Symetrics submitted a Forward Pricing Rate Proposal to DCMA and DCAA for CFYs 2008 and 2009.
  • The FPRP proposed overhead and G&A rates lower than the rates identified in Symetrics's specific price proposal.
  • Auditor Hepfner knew of the FPRP and recommended a contract clause addressing possible savings resulting from the FPRP audit.
  • The contracting officer and contract specialist's prenegotiation memorandum referenced the FPRP and the DCAA audit report but treated the higher price-proposal rates as the FPRP rates.
  • The parties agreed to the contract price for the 295 units, and Symetrics had not revised its price proposal to reflect the FPRP rates or transmitted those rates directly to the contracting officer or contract specialist.
  • Symetrics certified that the cost or pricing data submitted in support of the contract were accurate, complete, and current as of 01 April 2008.
  • The contracting officer later demanded payment of alleged excess cost plus interest.

Parties

Appellant
Symetrics Industries, LLC
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contracting Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W58RGZ-07-C-0204
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.