Symetrics Industries, LLC
Symetrics Industries, LLC appealed a contracting officer's final decision asserting defective pricing under a firm-fixed-price contract for modem units. The Board sustained the appeal, holding that the government failed to prove that Symetrics did not disclose the forward pricing rate proposal rates within the meaning of the Truth in Negotiations Act.
Material Facts
- The Department of the Army awarded Symetrics a letter contract for production of 295 Improved Data Modem 304 units.
- Symetrics submitted a firm-fixed-price proposal for the units.
- DCAA audited Symetrics's price proposal, and DCAA Auditor Sherry Hepfner conducted the audit.
- Symetrics submitted a Forward Pricing Rate Proposal to DCMA and DCAA for CFYs 2008 and 2009.
- The FPRP proposed overhead and G&A rates lower than the rates identified in Symetrics's specific price proposal.
- Auditor Hepfner knew of the FPRP and recommended a contract clause addressing possible savings resulting from the FPRP audit.
- The contracting officer and contract specialist's prenegotiation memorandum referenced the FPRP and the DCAA audit report but treated the higher price-proposal rates as the FPRP rates.
- The parties agreed to the contract price for the 295 units, and Symetrics had not revised its price proposal to reflect the FPRP rates or transmitted those rates directly to the contracting officer or contract specialist.
- Symetrics certified that the cost or pricing data submitted in support of the contract were accurate, complete, and current as of 01 April 2008.
- The contracting officer later demanded payment of alleged excess cost plus interest.
Parties
- Appellant
- Symetrics Industries, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contracting Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W58RGZ-07-C-0204
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- WEB LLC/WEBCONo. 63676September 23, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64235, 64236September 23, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64199August 4, 2026
- Weil Construction, Inc.No. 62742, 63155, 64045July 29, 2026
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Left Hand Design CorporationNo. 62458November 7, 2024
- Supreme Foodservice GmbHNo. 60309April 12, 2024
- AAI Corporation, d/b/a Textron Systems, Unmanned SystemsNo. 61195, 61356March 23, 2022
- BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P.No. 62703, 62704September 23, 2021
- Advanced Technologies Group, Inc.No. 59986, 61092November 18, 2020
- Alloy Surfaces Company, Inc.No. 59625April 9, 2020