Tanik Construction Company, Inc.
Tanik Construction Company, Inc. appealed a government motion for summary judgment regarding a release signed by Tanik, which the government argued waived its rights to advance claims. The Board denied the government's motion, allowing Tanik to proceed with its claims based on potential fraud.
Material Facts
- The United States Army Corps of Engineers awarded a contract to Tanik on April 9, 2014.
- Task Order No. 0001 was awarded to Tanik on September 25, 2014, for apron improvements at the Coast Guard Station, Kodiak, Alaska.
- Tanik discovered metal tie-downs in the apron that had been paved over, which it characterized as a differing site condition.
- The Corps issued bilateral contract Modification No. P00005 for Tanik to conduct a ground penetrating radar survey.
- Tanik executed Modification No. P00006, which extended the contract completion date but included release language.
- Tanik submitted a proposal for additional work related to the differing site condition, which resulted in Modification No. P00008.
- Tanik filed a Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) on October 2, 2018, seeking payment for costs stemming from the differing site condition.
- The CO denied Tanik's REA, stating that the costs should have been included in the contract modifications.
Parties
- Appellant
- Tanik Construction Company, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska
- Contracting Agency
- United States Army Corps of Engineers
- Contract Number
- W911KB-14-D-0016
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- KBR Services, LLCNo. 63870, 63956August 24, 2026
- AeroKool Aviation CorporationNo. 64377August 24, 2026
- Kropp Holdings, Inc.No. 64523August 24, 2026
- BFBC, LLCNo. 64509August 18, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.No. 64438July 30, 2026
Same Year
- KiewitPhelpsNo. 61184December 30, 2022
- Wright Brothers, the Building Company, Eagle LLCNo. 62285December 30, 2022
- Bhayana Brothers LLCNo. 63377December 23, 2022
- GMA-AVM Joint VentureNo. 63254December 21, 2022
- Global Technical SystemsNo. 63296December 21, 2022
- Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.No. 63182December 16, 2022
Same Issue
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
- Korte Construction CompanyNo. 63539, 63540September 30, 2026
- GiaMed Alliance JV, LLCNo. 64484September 29, 2026