62694

Passaran Noori Construction Company

July 29, 2021Judge Paul
Denied / Government PrevailedStatute of Limitations / Timeliness

Passaran Noori Construction Company appealed a contracting officer's decision to terminate its contract with the U.S. Army for convenience, claiming the termination was untimely. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment, ruling the claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

Material Facts

  • The Kabul Regional Contracting Center awarded Contract No. W91B4M-07-C-7144 to PNCC on August 9, 2007.
  • The contract was for a fixed-price amount of $567,037.51 and encompassed phase 3 of minor construction at Camp Phoenix.
  • There is no evidence that appellant commenced work on the project.
  • The contracting officer informed appellant of his intent to terminate the contract in October 2009.
  • The contract was terminated for convenience on April 19, 2010, with a final decision issued that informed appellant of its appeal rights.
  • Appellant filed a certified claim on July 22, 2020, acknowledging the CO's decision to terminate the contract.
  • The contracting officer rejected appellant's claim in a final decision issued on October 26, 2020, citing the expiration of the statute of limitations.

Parties

Appellant
Passaran Noori Construction Company
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army
Contract Number
W91B4M-07-C-7144
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.