Meltech Corporation, Inc.
Meltech Corporation, Inc. appealed a decision regarding its claim of superior knowledge against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers related to a construction contract. The Board denied Meltech's motion for summary judgment, finding material facts in dispute.
Material Facts
- Meltech Corporation, Inc. entered into a Firm-Fixed-Price contract with USACE for the renovation of Building 8609.
- Meltech filed a motion to amend its complaint to add counts for differing site condition, superior knowledge, and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing.
- The Board granted the amendment for differing site condition but denied the counts for superior knowledge and breach of good faith due to lack of jurisdiction.
- Meltech filed a certified claim with the contracting officer regarding superior knowledge, which was denied.
- Meltech did not appeal the contracting officer's final decision within the statutory deadline.
- Meltech alleged that USACE knew and failed to disclose vital information regarding the absence of as-built drawings and the concrete strength of Building 8609.
- The Board found that there were material facts in dispute regarding USACE's knowledge before the contract award.
Parties
- Appellant
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Contract Number
- W912DR-14-D-0021
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- 22nd Century Technologies, Inc.No. 63774-ADRMay 19, 2026
- Allserv, Inc.No. 64008-ADRMarch 2, 2026
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61871February 6, 2026
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61762, 61764January 16, 2026
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61765January 6, 2026
Same Year
- Red Bobtail TransportNo. FY24-03December 19, 2024
- Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials CompanyNo. 63739-ADRDecember 19, 2024
- Sauer IncorporatedNo. 62302, 62303December 18, 2024
- A Best Services Inc.No. 63816December 12, 2024
- Asturian Group, Inc.No. 63687December 10, 2024
- US21, Inc.No. 63830December 10, 2024
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Blackstone Consulting, Inc.No. 64558July 30, 2026
- Vision Distributors LLCNo. 64357July 17, 2026
- Inland Service Corporation, LLCNo. 63770May 21, 2026
- Shoreline Foundation, Inc.No. 62876, 63616April 6, 2026
- H&L Contracting LLCNo. 63695August 18, 2025