Warfighter Defense Inc.
Warfighter Defense Inc. appealed a contracting officer's final decision denying its request to waive an inspection requirement in a purchase order. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction but granted summary judgment in favor of the government.
Material Facts
- DLA issued Request for Quotations No. SPE4A6-24-T-855T seeking special purchase electrical cable assemblies.
- The RFQ indicated that FAR 52.246-2, INSPECTION OF SUPPLIES-FIXED PRICE, applied.
- Warfighter submitted its quote for the cables as a 'Bid without Exception' and confirmed the inspection point would be origin.
- DLA issued firm fixed price purchase order number SPE4A6-24-P-L702 for 1,122 cables.
- The purchase order incorporated by reference FAR 52.246-2 and included Clause E06, requiring inspection at source.
- Warfighter submitted a post-award request to DLA requesting removal of the inspection requirement.
- DLA denied the request, stating that the inspection requirement was necessary.
- Warfighter filed a claim under the Contract Disputes Act, alleging DLA's actions constituted a material breach.
- The contracting officer issued a final decision denying Warfighter's claim.
- Warfighter appealed the contracting officer's final decision to the Board.
Parties
- Appellant
- Warfighter Defense Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Contract Number
- SPE4A6-24-P-L702
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
- GiaMed Alliance JV, LLCNo. 64484September 29, 2026
- DCS CorporationNo. 64648September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
Same Year
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.No. 60979December 30, 2025
- Kallidus TechnologiesNo. 61377, 61976December 18, 2025
- Warfighter Defense, Inc.No. 63908, 63909December 11, 2025
- Targe Logistic Services CompanyNo. 63282December 10, 2025
- K2 Solutions, Inc.No. 62768December 9, 2025
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64307December 8, 2025
Same Issue
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- The Haskell CompanyNo. 64380, 64381May 5, 2026
- Futures, Inc.No. 61566April 16, 2026
- Endure Industries, Inc.No. 64064March 23, 2026
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64309March 2, 2026