644376446464465

VAE, Inc.

September 9, 2026Judge Hamady
Partially SustainedContract InterpretationContract Formation / ExistenceAuthority of Government AgentsQuantum / DamagesCDA Jurisdiction

VAE, Inc. appealed the deemed denial of a claim alleging that DISA continued using InQuest products and services after the applicable license periods expired without reimbursing VAE. The Board denied the government’s motion to dismiss the breach-of-contract and implied-in-fact-contract theories, but dismissed the quantum-meruit portion of the complaint.

Material Facts

  • NASA awarded VAE an indefinite-quantity SEWP contract for specified computer, networking, security, support, and related products and services.
  • DISA awarded VAE delivery order HC102821F0036 under the SEWP contract with a base year and two option years.
  • The delivery order required VAE to provide InQuest hardware, software, hardware maintenance, and software support.
  • DISA exercised the first option year but did not exercise the second option year.
  • Modification No. P00005 procured the InQuest products and services that were the subject of VAE’s claim.
  • VAE alleged that the government continued using those InQuest products and services after the license and subscription expiration dates.
  • VAE alleged that the licenses were incorporated into and part of the delivery order.
  • VAE alleged that the government requested a temporary extension of the licenses and made representations concerning payment, renewal, and exercise of the second option year.
  • An email in the claim record indicated that InQuest extended device licenses and continued field and ticket support at the request of Franco Canton, DISA’s Branch Chief of the JRSS Program Control Branch.

Parties

Appellant
VAE, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Information Systems Agency
Contracting Agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Contract Number
NNG15SC94B
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.