CBCA 1078

GHR Fire Management Services

Apr 29, 2008Judge GoodmanDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
GHR Fire Management Services
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
Goodman
Case number
CBCA 1078
Decided
Apr 29, 2008The decision states Apr 29, 2008 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
On April 16, 2008, the parties executed a settlement agreement, and on April 25, 2008, they filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.1 1 The parties' joint motion for dismissal with prejudice refers to a settlement evidenced by an attached settlement agreement which states in part: "Should any judicial action be required to enforce or interpret this agreement, or to resolve any d...
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Nelda Herman
GHR Fire Management Services
Klamath Falls, OR
For the respondent
Marnie G. Ganotis
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
San Francisco, CA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,372 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 29, 2008 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 29, 2008

CBCA 1078

GHR FIRE MANAGEMENT SERVICES,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Nelda Herman, CEO of GHR Fire Management Services, Klamath Falls, OR, appearing for Appellant.

Marnie G. Ganotis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San Francisco, CA , counsel for Respondent.

GOODMAN, Board Judge.

Order

This appeal was filed on February 12, 2008. On April 10, 2008, a Board Judge serving as Board neutral conducted an alternative dispute resolution proceeding pursuant to Board Rule 54 during which the parties reached a settlement. On April 16, 2008, the parties executed a settlement agreement, and on April 25, 2008, they filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. __________________________________

The parties’ joint motion for dismissal with prejudice refers to a settlement evidenced by an attached settlement agreement which states in part: “Should any judicial action be required to enforce or interpret this agreement, or to resolve any dispute hereunder,

2 CBCA 1078

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

the Parties acknowledge the jurisdiction and venue for the action shall lie solely with the CBCA.” The Board makes no determination as to whether the parties’ suggestion of the scope of the Board’s jurisdiction is correct.

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in GHR Fire Management Services, CBCA 1078. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.