DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: September 29, 2026
CBCA 8954
STUDIOS ARCHITECTURE,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Michael J. Byrne of Byrne & O’Neill, LLP, New York, NY, counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Justin S. Hawkins, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
On September 28, 2026, the parties filed a voluntary stipulation of dismissal, jointly requesting dismissal of the appeal without prejudice. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (published in eCFR)).
Allan H. Goodman
Board Judge
The stipulation of dismissal states, “The parties agree the captioned appeal should be dismissed because the Contracting Officer’[s] Final Decision is a legal ‘nullity.’” The Board has not reviewed the decision referenced by the parties.
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Studios Architecture, CBCA 8954. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.