DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 10, 2008
CBCA 1313
UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Kevin M. Cox of Carmardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
James E. Hicks and Sheryl B. Jamison, Office of Chief Counsel, Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice, Alexandria, VA, counsel for Respondent.
HYATT, Board Judge.
This appeal arose under a contract for the provision of translation, transcription, and monitoring services awarded to appellant, Universal Language Corporation, by the Drug Enforcement Administration, a bureau of respondent, the Department of Justice. Appellant has informed the Board that the parties have settled this matter. In addition, appellant has requested that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
CATHERINE B. HYATT
Board Judge
2 CBCA 1313
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Universal Language Corporation, CBCA 1313. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.