CBCA 1514

Sarah Chandler

Apr 17, 2009Judge GoodmanDEPARTMENT OF STATE
Not published in the listingDismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Key Facts

Appellant
Sarah Chandler
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Judge
Goodman
Case number
CBCA 1514
Decided
Apr 17, 2009The decision states Apr 17, 2009 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant (pro se)
Sarah Chandler and FPO Area Pacific
For the respondent
Dennis J. Gallagher
Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State
Rosslyn, VA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 806 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 17, 2009 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF STATE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 17, 2009

CBCA 1514

SARAH CHANDLER,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Sarah Chandler, pro se, FPO Area Pacific.

Dennis J. Gallagher, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, counsel for Respondent.

GOODMAN, Board Judge.

Order

On February 24, 2009, appellant, Sarah Chandler, filed a notice of appeal in connection with a dispute under purchase order number SCH-500-08-M-3324, for the editing and production of the U.S. Beijing community newsletter. Thereafter, respondent filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. On April 14, 2009, appellant informed the Board she is withdrawing the appeal.

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Sarah Chandler, CBCA 1514. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.