CBCA 1695, 2156

Serco, Inc.

Aug 29, 2011Judge BorwickPENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Serco, Inc.
Respondent agency
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Judge
Borwick
Case number
CBCA 1695, 2156This cell names 2 dockets: 1695, 2156.
Decided
Aug 29, 2011The decision states Aug 29, 2011 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
Pursuant to the agreement of the parties and Rule 12(c), these appeals are DISMISSED.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Procedure and sanctions

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Rebecca E. Pearson and J. Scott Hommer and Dismas N. Locaria and Maria A.
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Mark L. Hansen and Kimberly A. Manganello and Scott D. Sadler and Andrew J. Seff
Office of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 869 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Aug 29, 2011 on its own faceRespondent PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED: August 29, 2011

CBCA 1695, 2156

SERCO, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Rebecca E. Pearson, J. Scott Hommer, Dismas N. Locaria, and Maria A. del-Cerro of Venable LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Mark L. Hansen, Kimberly A. Manganello, Scott D. Sadler, and Andrew J. Seff, Office of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

BORWICK, Board Judge.

Order

On August 26, 2011, the parties reported that they had reached a settlement of these appeals and moved to dismiss them. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties and Rule 12(c), these appeals are DISMISSED. The underlying settlement agreement, by request of the parties, is deemed protected material under the protective order entered in these appeals. ANTHONY S. BORWICK

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Serco, Inc., CBCA 1695, 2156. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.