CBCA 3270

Environmental Quality Management, Inc

Sep 21, 2013Judge BorwickENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Environmental Quality Management, Inc
Respondent agency
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Judge
Borwick
Case number
CBCA 3270The Board's own document filename encodes 3072 instead. Both are the Board's, and the disagreement is recorded rather than resolved.
Decided
Sep 21, 2013The decision states Oct 21, 2013 on its own face, which is not the date the listing gives. Both are shown rather than one being quietly preferred.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
Pursuant to Rule 12(c), the appeal is DISMISSED.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Brian W. Craver
Person & Craver LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Kenneth R. Pakula and Sara E. McGraw
Office of General Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 605 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Oct 21, 2013 on its own faceRespondent ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED: October 21, 2013

CBCA 3072

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Brian W. Craver of Person & Craver LLP, Washington, DC, appearing for Appellant. Kenneth R. Pakula and Sara E. McGraw, Office of General Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

BORWICK, Board Judge.

Order

On September 30, 2013, appellant advised the Board that the appeal has been settled and submitted a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Rule 12(c), the appeal is DISMISSED. ________________________________

ANTHONY S. BORWICK

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Environmental Quality Management, Inc, CBCA 3270. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.