CBCA 2085

MLB Transportation Company, Inc.

Aug 22, 2011Judge GoodmanDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Not published in the listingGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
MLB Transportation Company, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Goodman
Case number
CBCA 2085
Decided
Aug 22, 2011The decision states Aug 22, 2011 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The Rambeau Law Group, P.C.
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
This appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
James E. Rambeau
The Rambeau Law Group, P.C.
Norcross, GA
For the respondent
Harold W. Askins III and Patricia Anne Hooks
Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Decatur, GA
For the respondent
Natica C. Neely
Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Jackson, MS
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,351 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Aug 22, 2011 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

3 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Other statutes1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: August 22, 2011

CBCA 2085

MLB TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

James E. Rambeau of The Rambeau Law Group, P.C., Norcross, GA, counsel for

Appellant.

Harold W. Askins III and Patricia Anne Hooks, Office of Regional Counsel,

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Department of Veterans Affairs, Decatur, GA; and Natica C. Neely, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Jackson, MS, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges GILMORE, BORWICK, and GOODMAN.

GOODMAN, Board Judge.

This appeal relates to a claim submitted by the appellant, MLB Transportation Company, Inc. (MLB), in connection with contract numbers V247P-1264 and V247P-0755 for transportation services to the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Atlanta, Georgia. On August 18, 2011, the parties filed a joint motion for judgment on stipulated settlement, stipulating to an award by this Board in favor of MLB in the amount of $50,000 in full settlement of its claims under the instant appeal.

____________________________

2 CBCA 2085

The parties have stipulated further that interest on such amount will begin to accrue thirty days after the Board’s issuance of this decision, at the interest rate(s) published by the Secretary of the Treasury semi-annually for purposes of the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109, should payment not be made by that date. Finally, the parties have stipulated that neither party will seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision and that neither party will appeal the Board’s decision.

Decision

This appeal is GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ stipulation of settlement and joint motion, the Board awards the appellant the sum of $50,000 for all claims under the appeal. P ayment is to be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006). Interest on said sum shall begin to accrue thirty days after issuance of this judgment order, at the interest rate(s) published by the Secretary of the Treasury semi annually for purposes of the CDA, should payment of the award not have been made by that date, and shall be paid to the appellant together with the award.

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

We concur:

BERYL S. GILMORE

Board Judge

ANTHONY S. BORWICK

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in MLB Transportation Company, Inc., CBCA 2085. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.