CBCA 2321

Hpi/Gsa Properties One, L.P.

Aug 3, 2011Judge HyattGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Hpi/Gsa Properties One, L.P.
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Hyatt
Case number
CBCA 2321
Decided
Aug 3, 2011The decision states Aug 3, 2011 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Washington
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
Pursuant to the parties' motion, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Scott M. Heimberg and Andrea T. Vavonese
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Washington
For the respondent
Mel E. Myers
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,731 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Aug 3, 2011 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

3 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Contract Disputes Act1
Other statutes1
Public laws1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: August 3, 2011

CBCA 2321

HPI/GSA PROPERTIES ONE, L.P.,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

Scott M. Heimberg and Andrea T. Vavonese of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld

LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Mel E. Myers, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges HYATT, GOODMAN, and McCANN.

HYATT, Board Judge.

This appeal is from a contracting officer’s decision denying a claim for $249,161.01, plus interest, for operating cost adjustments under a lease of office space in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The parties have resolved their dispute and have submitted an executed copy of a joint motion for judgment on stipulated settlement in the amount of $194,690.38, with payment to be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2006).

The parties stipulate that the judgment amount represents full and final settlement of the claim presented and is inclusive of all costs, attorney fees, and interest. The parties _________________________________

__________________________________ _________________________________

2 CBCA 2321

further stipulate that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision, and they will not appeal the decision.

Decision

Pursuant to the parties’ motion, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART. The Board awards to HPI/GSA Properties One, L.P. the sum of $194,690.38, to be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund. 31 U.S.C. § 1304; 41 U.S.C. § 7108 (as codified by Pub. L. No. 111-350, 124 Stat. 3677, 3816 (2011)).

CATHERINE B. HYATT

Board Judge

We concur:

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

R. ANTHONY McCANN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Hpi/Gsa Properties One, L.P., CBCA 2321. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.