CBCA 2647, 3045, 3753

Corrections Corporation of America

Jan 19, 2016Judge LesterDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
DismissalSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Corrections Corporation of America
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Judge
Lester
Case number
CBCA 2647, 3045, 3753This cell names 3 dockets: 2647, 3045, 3753.
Decided
Jan 19, 2016The decision states Jan 19, 2016 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP
Outcome
Settled
These appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. _____________________________ HAROLD D.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Scott M. Heimberg and Julia Lippman
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Song U. Kim and Mark E. Menacker
Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 902 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jan 19, 2016 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 19, 2016

CBCA 2647, 3045, 3753

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondent.

Scott M. Heimberg and Julia Lippman of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP,

Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Song U. Kim and Mark E. Menacker, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor,

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

LESTER, Board Judge.

Order

On January 13, 2016, the appellant notified the Board that the parties have settled the claims at issue in the above-referenced appeals. It requests that the Board dismiss these appeals with prejudice, and the respondent concurs with the request.

In accordance with the appellant’s request, the Board grants the motion. These appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_____________________________

HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Corrections Corporation of America, CBCA 2647, 3045, 3753. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.