CBCA 2872, 5250, 5251

Aurora, LLC

Sep 19, 2016Judge HyattDEPARTMENT OF STATE
DismissalDismissed on other grounds

Key Facts

Appellant
Aurora, LLC
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Judge
Hyatt
Case number
CBCA 2872, 5250, 5251This cell names 3 dockets: 2872, 5250, 5251.
Decided
Sep 19, 2016The decision states Sep 19, 2016 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
Jones Day, Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC
Outcome
Dismissed on other grounds
Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Richard C. Johnson and Edmund A. Amorosi and Daniel Q. Horner
Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC
Vienna, VA
For the appellant
Peter F. Garvin, III and Grant H. Willis and Ryan P. McGovern
Jones Day
Washington, DC
For the respondent
John C. Sawyer and Thomas D. Dinackus and Erin M. Kriynovich
Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State
Rosslyn, VA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 893 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 19, 2016 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF STATE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 19, 2016

CBCA 2872, 5250, 5251

AURORA, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

Respondent.

Richard C. Johnson, Edmund A. Amorosi, and Daniel Q. Horner of Smith Pachter

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

McWhorter PLC, Vienna, VA; and Peter F. Garvin, III, Grant H. Willis, and Ryan P. McGovern of Jones Day, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

John C. Sawyer, Thomas D. Dinackus, and Erin M. Kriynovich, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State, Rosslyn, VA, counsel for Respondent.

HYATT, Board Judge.

On September 16, 2016, appellant, Aurora, LLC, filed a motion advising that all matters in these consolidated appeals have been satisfactorily resolved by the parties and requesting that the Board dismiss the appeals with prejudice.

Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

__________________________________

CATHERINE B. HYATT

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Aurora, LLC, CBCA 2872, 5250, 5251. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.