DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 27, 2015
CBCA 3952
GRIMM’S GARDENS, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Paul H. Sanderford of Sanderford & Carroll, PC, Temple, TX, counsel for Appellant. Daniel A. Bowen and Lindsay Middaugh, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Temple, TX, counsel for Respondent.
POLLACK, Board Judge.
Order
Appellant, Grimm’s Gardens, LLC, was awarded a contract by the Department of Agriculture for the removal of a variety of vegetation and woody species from training areas within Fort Hood, Texas, to improve training areas. Appellant filed an appeal, stating that it incurred significant losses in the performance of the contract.
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss, stating that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement which disposes of all claims involved and requesting the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.
Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
______________________________
HOWARD A. POLLACK
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Grimm's Gardens, LLC, CBCA 3952. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.