CBCA 5005-C(4022-RELO)

Sheri L. Ellis-Smith

Apr 7, 2016Judge Hyatt
DismissalRuled on a motion

Key Facts

Appellant
Sheri L. Ellis-Smith
Respondent agency
Read from the decision's own caption, and this one matches no measured caption shape or its text is not captured. The Board's listing names no agency at all.
Judge
Hyatt
Case number
CBCA 5005-C(4022-RELO)
Decided
Apr 7, 2016The decision states Apr 7, 2016 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Ruled on a motion
Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
Read from this decision's own closing paragraph, which is what the Board printed where it printed no disposition line, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

EAJA and fees

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,703 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Apr 7, 2016 on its own face Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Equal Access to Justice Act2

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

April 7, 2016

CBCA 5005-C(4022-RELO)

In the Matter of SHERI L. ELLIS-SMITH

Shaun Southworth and Terina M. Williams of Southworth PC, Atlanta, GA, appearing

for Claimant.

Jennifer McGuire, Director of Budget and Finance, Albuquerque Service Center,

Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, Albuquerque, NM, appearing for Department of

Agriculture.

HYATT, Board Judge.

Claimant, Sheri L. Ellis-Smith, asked the Board to review a decision by the Forest Service to disallow certain relocation expenses it had authorized in connection with her move from Bahrain to accept a position with the agency in Ketchikan, Alaska. The Board granted the claim. Sheri L. Ellis-Smith, CBCA 4022-RELO, 15-1 BCA ¶ 36,057. Thereafter, Ms. Ellis-Smith filed an application, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 5 U.S.C. § 504 (2012), for an award of the attorney fees she incurred in conjunction with the claim.

In response to the application, the Board directed claimant’s attention to case law holding that proceedings conducted under the Board’s authority to settle claims involving expenses incurred by federal civilian employees for official travel and transportation, and for relocation expenses incident to a transfer of an official duty station, are not encompassed within the definition of “adversary adjudication” as defined by EAJA. Dannette Wood, CBCA 1681-C(1393-RELO), 09-2 BCA ¶ 34,295; Dennis Nielsen, GSBCA 15981-RELO, 03-1 BCA ¶ 32,150 (2002).

After reviewing these decisions, claimant elected to withdraw her application for attorney fees and requests that the matter be dismissed. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

__________________________________

CATHERINE B. HYATT

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Sheri L. Ellis-Smith, CBCA 5005-C(4022-RELO). Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.