CBCA 5506, 5715, 5849

JBG/Federal Center, L.L.C.

Jan 28, 2019Judge Sullivan
DismissalSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
JBG/Federal Center, L.L.C.
Respondent agency
Read from the decision's own caption, and this one matches no measured caption shape or its text is not captured. The Board's listing names no agency at all.
Judge
Sullivan
Case number
CBCA 5506, 5715, 5849This cell names 3 dockets: 5506, 5715, 5849.
Decided
Jan 28, 2019The decision states Jan 28, 2019 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
Greenstein DeLorem & Luchs, P.C.
Outcome
Settled
In accordance with the parties' request, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Vincent Mark J. Policy and William C. Casano
Greenstein DeLorem & Luchs, P.C.
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Lesley Busch Uhr and Bradley Boettcher
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,098 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jan 28, 2019 on its own face Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: January 28, 2019

CBCA 5506, 5715, 5849

JBG/FEDERAL CENTER, L.L.C.,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent in CBCA 5506, 5849

and

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Respondent in CBCA 5715,

Vincent Mark J. Policy and William C. Casano of Greenstein DeLorem & Luchs,

P.C.,Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Lesley Busch Uhr and Bradley Boettcher, Office of General Counsel, General

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent in CBCA 5506, 5849. Lynn M. Deavers and Michael A. Smith, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent in CBCA 5715.

SULLIVAN, Board Judge.

Order

The Board is in receipt of the parties’ joint motion to dismiss, filed on December 28, 2018, in the above-referenced cases. The parties state that they have entered into a settlement agreement which resolves all matters and request that the Board dismiss these appeals with prejudice. In accordance with the parties’ request, these appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Marian E. Sullivan

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in JBG/Federal Center, L.L.C., CBCA 5506, 5715, 5849. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.