CBCA 5654

Xcelerated Subsistence Solutions

Mar 2, 2017Judge DrummondDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DismissalDismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Key Facts

Appellant
Xcelerated Subsistence Solutions
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Judge
Drummond
Case number
CBCA 5654
Decided
Mar 2, 2017The decision states Mar 2, 2017 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
The appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
A. Alan Weis
Xcerlerated Subsistence Solutions
Hollywood, FL
For the respondent
William Robinson and Nihar Vora
Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,688 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Mar 2, 2017 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Cases cited

1 case this decision cites, in the order it first names it. 1 of them opens at a publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved: the party names and the citation are as the decision prints them. A case cited to a reporter is not held here, so where it opens was confirmed one citation at a time against an outside database and is labelled as leaving this app; a citation that database could not place, or matched to more than one case, is shown without a link rather than guessed at. A case named without a citation of any kind carries nothing to read, so it is left out rather than guessed at, and this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: March 2, 2017

CBCA 5654

XCELERATED SUBSISTENCE SOLUTIONS,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

A. Alan Weis, Managing Partner of Xcerlerated Subsistence Solutions, Hollywood,

FL, appearing for Appellant.

William Robinson and Nihar Vora, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges DRUMMOND, ZISCHKAU, and O’ROURKE.

DRUMMOND, Board Judge.

Appellant filed this appeal on February 17, 2017, from respondent’s decision to terminate a purchase order to supply certified religious foods. In its notice of appeal, appellant alleged that it is entitled to damages totaling $15,000.

During a telephonic conference on February 27, 2017, the parties agreed that the appeal is jurisdictionally deficient because no claim has been filed and no final decision has been issued by the contracting officer. A prerequisite to Board jurisdiction is a contracting officer’s final decision on a claim. Sharp Electronics Corp. v. McHugh, 707 F.3d 1367, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2013). Without the filing of a claim and the issuance of a final decision (or the failure to issue such a decision within the prescribed period of time), this Board lacks jurisdiction. Energx, LLC v. Department of Energy, CBCA 3060, slip op. at 2 (January 25, 2017); Macrosystems v. General Services Administration, CBCA 2158, 11-1 BCA ¶ 34,622, at 170,618 (2010).

Decision

The appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

JEROME M. DRUMMOND

Board Judge

We Concur:

JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU

Board Judge

KATHLEEN J. O’ROURKE

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Xcelerated Subsistence Solutions, CBCA 5654. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.