CBCA 5682

Herman Construction Group, Inc.

Jun 22, 2017Judge GoodmanDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
DecisionGranted in partby agreement

Key Facts

Appellant
Herman Construction Group, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Goodman
Case number
CBCA 5682
Decided
Jun 22, 2017The decision states Jun 22, 2017 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Bruckner Law Firm, APC
Outcome
Granted in partEntered by agreement of the parties.
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation for award contained in the settlement agreement, the Board GRANTS the appeal IN PART.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Jessica L. Mulvaney and William L. Bruckner
Bruckner Law Firm, APC
San Diego, CA
For the respondent
David G. Fagan
Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Portland, OR
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,638 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jun 22, 2017 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Other statutes1
Agency FAR supplements1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: June 22, 2017

CBCA 5682

HERMAN CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

Jessica L. Mulvaney and William L. Bruckner of Bruckner Law Firm, APC, San

Diego, CA, counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges GOODMAN, DRUMMOND, and LESTER.

GOODMAN, Board Judge.

On March 21, 2017, appellant, Herman Construction Group, Inc., filed this appeal arising from respondent, Department of Veterans Affairs, contracting officer’s final decision denying appellant’s certified claim in the amount of $449,276.40.

On June 21, 2017, pursuant to Board Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2016)), the parties submitted an executed settlement agreement containing a stipulation of award for judgment in the amount of three hundred twenty-seven thousand, six hundred and seventy-five dollars ($327,675). Their settlement agreement states in relevant part: [Respondent] agrees to pay Appellant $327,675.00 as full and complete settlement of the APPEAL inclusive of all costs, attorney’s fees, and interest; . . . [Appellant] agrees that the payment . . . above shall constitute full and complete settlement [of] the APPEAL arising out of or relating to the CONTRACT, including all costs, attorney’s fees and interest.

Within 14 calendar days of the CBCA issuing an Order adopting the terms of this Agreement, [respondent] agrees to submit and approve all documents necessary to ensure payment by the Judgment Fund; If payment is not made by the Judgment Fund within 30 calendar days after an Order is issued by the CBCA, Appellant will be entitled to interest on the $327,675.00 payment at the rates set by the Treasury Department for the payment of CDA claims. Any interest paid under this paragraph will begin to accrue 31 calendar days after the CBCA issued Order and continue to run until the date of payment.

In addition, pursuant to Rule 25(b), the parties state that they will not seek review or reconsideration of, or relief from, this decision, and will not appeal it.

Decision

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation for award contained in the settlement agreement, the Board GRANTS the appeal IN PART. Appellant is awarded a total of $327,675, with additional interest, if any, that may accrue pursuant to the agreement of the parties. Payment may be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304 (2012). ____________________

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

We concur:

JEROME M. DRUMMOND

Board Judge

HAROLD D. LESTER, JR.

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Herman Construction Group, Inc., CBCA 5682. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.