GRANTED IN PART: March 29, 2007
CBCA 580
J. KOKOLAKIS CONTRACTING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Axel Bolvig, III, of Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP, Birmingham, AL, counsel for Appellant.
Kenneth B. MacKenzie, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SHERIDAN, KULLBERG, and WALTERS.
WALTERS, Board Judge.
1. On March 23, 2007, the Department of Veterans Affairs and appellant filed a Joint Motion for Judgment on Stipulated Settlement. The motion encloses a Stipulation of Settlement finally executed on March 23, 2007, and entered into by the parties concerning CBCA 580.
2. The parties recite that they have reached “amicable resolution” of the issues which are the subject of CBCA 580 and jointly move that the Board enter judgment in the amount of $2,325,000, which includes “all costs, both direct and indirect, including CDA interest, and attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act.”
___________________________
____________________________ ___________________________
2 CBCA 580
3. Inasmuch as the parties have stipulated the equitable adjustment due J. Kokolakis Contracting, Inc. in CBCA 580, their Joint Motion for Judgment on Stipulated Settlement is granted. This appeal is GRANTED IN PART. Appellant is found entitled to $2,325,000, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation of Settlement entered into by the parties.
RICHARD C. WALTERS
Board Judge
We concur:
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
3 CBCA 580
#18960 CBCA 580 J Kokolakis Contracting Inc. Judgement on Stipulated Settlement.wpd 3/29/07 Reviewed by:RCW CLH
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in J. Kokolakis Contracting, Inc., CBCA 580. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.