PricingGAO ProtestASBCACMMCMCPFAQResources
CBCA 5907, 5907-R

Walker Development & Trading Group Inc.

Feb 18, 2020Judge Per CuriamDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
DecisionRuled on a motion

Key Facts

Appellant
Walker Development & Trading Group Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Per Curiam
Case number
CBCA 5907, 5907-RThis cell names 2 dockets: 5907, 5907-R.
Decided
Feb 18, 2020The decision states Feb 18, 2020 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Ruled on a motion
Based upon a majority vote of the Board's judges, Walker's motions for full Board consideration are DENIED.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Terrance Walker
Walker Development & Trading Group Inc.
Reno, NV
For the respondent
David G. Fagan
Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Portland, OR
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

View plans and pricing

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

View plans and pricing

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

View plans and pricing

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 1,037 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Feb 18, 2020 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

1 authority read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Agency FAR supplements1
48 C.F.R. § 6101.28

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

MOTIONS FOR FULL BOARD CONSIDERATION DENIED:

February 18, 2020

CBCA 5907, 5907-R

WALKER DEVELOPMENT & TRADING GROUP INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Terrance Walker of Walker Development & Trading Group Inc., Reno, NV, appearing for Appellant.

David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.

Before the Full Board.

PER CURIAM.

On July 10, 2019, appellant, Walker Development & Trading Group Inc. (Walker), filed a motion pursuant to CBCA Rule 28(a) (48 CFR 6101.28(a)(2018)) asking the full Board to consider the decision that the panel issued on July 3, 2019, and to issue a new decision that is consistent with precedent. On November 14, 2019, Walker again filed a motion pursuant to CBCA Rule 28(a) asking the full Board to consider the panel’s July 3 decision and also the panel’s reconsidered decision issued on November 13, 2019. Based upon a majority vote of the Board’s judges, Walker’s motions for full Board consideration are DENIED.

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Walker Development & Trading Group Inc., CBCA 5907, 5907-R. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.