DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 20, 2023
CBCA 6795
GRAND STRATEGY, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Gaëtan Gerville-Réache and Adam D. Bruski of Warner Norcross + Judd LLP, Grand
Rapids, MI, counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Francis P. Gainer and Adrienne Z. Schwartz, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC; and Jennifer Claypool, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Hines, IL, counsel for Respondent.
O’ROURKE, Board Judge.
Order
On October 19, 2023, the parties submitted a joint request to dismiss this appeal with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees. In the motion, the parties stated that they have resolved all issues under appeal through a settlement agreement, bilateral modifications to the contracts, and payment of the settlement amount. The motion is granted. The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Kathleen J. O’Rourke
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Grand Strategy, LLC, CBCA 6795. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.