CBCA 8119

Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority

Jul 23, 2025Judge SullivanDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
DecisionDismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Key Facts

Appellant
Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Judge
Sullivan
Case number
CBCA 8119
Decided
Jul 23, 2025The decision states Jul 23, 2025 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Decision
Law firm for the appellant
Thompson Coburn LLP
Outcome
Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AS MOOT
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from that line, because the decision's text states no operative ruling we could isolate. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Scott F. Lane
Thompson Coburn LLP
St. Louis, MO
For the appellant
Jayna M. Rust
Thompson Coburn LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Candice Jackson and Tim Rushenberg
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Education
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,249 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jul 23, 2025 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AS MOOT: July 23, 2025

CBCA 8119

MISSOURI HIGHER EDUCATION LOAN AUTHORITY,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,

Respondent.

Scott F. Lane of Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO; and Jayna M. Rust of

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Thompson Coburn LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Candice Jackson and Tim Rushenberg, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Education, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges LESTER, GOODMAN, and SULLIVAN.

SULLIVAN, Board Judge.

By joint motion filed July 21, 2025, the parties seek dismissal of the appeal because the contracting officer for the Department of Education has withdrawn the decision that Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority appealed. Because the withdrawal of the decision in which the Government asserted a claim resolves the dispute, “there is nothing left for the Board to decide, and dismissal of the appeal as moot is appropriate.” Avue Technologies Corp. v. Agency for Global Media, CBCA 6752, et al., 20-1 BCA ¶ 37,639, at 182,755.

This appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AS MOOT.

Marian E. Sullivan

Board Judge

We concur:

Harold D. Lester,

Board Judge

Jr. Allan H. Goodman

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, CBCA 8119. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.