CBCA 8389

RedOrange LLC

May 4, 2026Judge GoodmanDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DismissalSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
RedOrange LLC
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
Goodman
Case number
CBCA 8389
Decided
May 4, 2026The decision states May 4, 2026 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
Company Counsel LLC
Outcome
Settled
The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Jon A. Thielen
Company Counsel LLC
Bala Cynwyd, PA
For the respondent
Tyler Ellis
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,417 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 4, 2026 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 4, 2026

CBCA 8389

REDORANGE LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

Jon A. Thielen of Company Counsel LLC, Bala Cynwyd, PA, counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Tyler Ellis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

GOODMAN, Board Judge.

Order

On March 20, 2025, RedOrange LLC filed an appeal of a final decision by a contracting officer of the Department of Agriculture, which was docketed by the Board as CBCA 8389. On December 4, 2025, the parties jointly requested that the appeal be resolved through binding arbitration.

The parties each filed supplements to the record, position papers, replies, and affidavits or statements from witnesses. On April 21, 2026, the arbitrator held a conference with the parties, during which each party confirmed that the appeal would be resolved through binding arbitration, that each party would be bound by the judgment issued by the arbitrator, and that the judgment would not be appealable.

On April 30, 2026, the arbitrator held another conference with the parties and presented an oral explanation of the binding resolution of the appeal, confirmed in the arbitrator’s memorandum dated April 30, 2026. The arbitrator issued a binding, unappealable arbitration decision, and no issues remain to be resolved.

The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Allan H. Goodman

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in RedOrange LLC, CBCA 8389. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.