PricingGAO ProtestASBCACMMCMCPFAQResources
CBCA 8889

Oready LLC

Jul 28, 2026Judge RussellDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DismissalSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Oready LLC
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Judge
Russell
Case number
CBCA 8889
Decided
Jul 28, 2026The decision states Jul 28, 2026 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (published in eCFR)), the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Michael Faro
Oready LLC
Las Vegas, NV
For the respondent
Brian A. Quint
Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

View plans and pricing

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

View plans and pricing

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

View plans and pricing

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 597 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jul 28, 2026 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

1 authority read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Agency FAR supplements1
48 C.F.R. § 6101.12

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 28, 2026

CBCA 8889

OREADY LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Michael Faro, Member of Oready LLC, Las Vegas, NV, appearing for Appellant.

Brian A. Quint, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

RUSSELL, Board Judge.

Order

On June 23, 2026, the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice based on their settlement agreement. Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2) (published in eCFR)), the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Beverly M. Russell

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Oready LLC, CBCA 8889. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.