CBCA 947

Kachina Ventures, LLC

May 10, 2010Judge KullbergGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Kachina Ventures, LLC
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Kullberg
Case number
CBCA 947
Decided
May 10, 2010The decision states May 10, 2010 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Rusing & Lopez, P.L.L.C.
Outcome
Settled
On May 5, 2010, the parties advised the Board that the settlement had been finalized and jointly moved that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice. ______________________ 2 Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from this decision's own closing paragraph, which is what the Board printed where it printed no disposition line, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Pat P. Lopez III
Rusing & Lopez, P.L.L.C.
Tucson, AZ
For the respondent
Leigh Erin S. Izzo
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 838 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 10, 2010 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

ORDER: May 10, 2010

CBCA 947

KACHINA VENTURES, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Pat P. Lopez III of Rusing & Lopez, P.L.L.C., Tucson, AZ, counsel for Appellant. Leigh Erin S. Izzo, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

KULLBERG, Board Judge.

Order

The Board docketed this appeal on October 30, 2007. On March 3, 2010, the parties advised the Board that they had agreed to a settlement in principle and requested that proceedings be stayed in order to finalize the terms of the settlement.

On May 5, 2010, the parties advised the Board that the settlement had been finalized and jointly moved that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice.

______________________

2 CBCA 947

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

H. CHUCK KULLBERG

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Kachina Ventures, LLC, CBCA 947. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.