57224

Utility Construction Company, Inc.

August 17, 2012Judge Delman
Denied / Government PrevailedFailure to Prosecute / Dismissal

Utility Construction Company, Inc. appealed a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute under the Contract Disputes Act. The Board denied the government's motion, finding that the appellant did not exhibit contumacious conduct.

Material Facts

  • Appellant filed this appeal on 5 May 2010, based upon the failure of the contracting officer to act on its certified claim dated 4 January 2010 in the amount of $1,418,683.52.
  • On 9 July 2010, the government filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.
  • Appellant failed to file its response to the government's motion by the due date but filed it late on 7 September 2010.
  • On 13 May 2011, the government propounded to appellant Request for Admissions, Interrogatories, and a Request for Production of Documents.
  • Appellant failed to file any objections or answers to this discovery by 27 June 2011.
  • On 25 July 2011, appellant filed responses to the Request for Production and to the Requests for Admissions, but no answers to interrogatories were provided.
  • The Board ordered appellant to respond to the government's motions to compel by 19 October 2011, but appellant did not respond.
  • On 12 January 2012, appellant filed a 'Motion for a 90 Day Stay' citing personal and financial issues.
  • The government opposed the stay and requested dismissal for failure to prosecute.
  • The Board ultimately denied the government's motion to dismiss.

Parties

Appellant
Utility Construction Company, Inc.
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contracting Agency
U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles
Contract Number
W912PL-07-D-0044
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.