Utility Construction Company, Inc.
Utility Construction Company, Inc. appealed a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute under the Contract Disputes Act. The Board denied the government's motion, finding that the appellant did not exhibit contumacious conduct.
Material Facts
- Appellant filed this appeal on 5 May 2010, based upon the failure of the contracting officer to act on its certified claim dated 4 January 2010 in the amount of $1,418,683.52.
- On 9 July 2010, the government filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.
- Appellant failed to file its response to the government's motion by the due date but filed it late on 7 September 2010.
- On 13 May 2011, the government propounded to appellant Request for Admissions, Interrogatories, and a Request for Production of Documents.
- Appellant failed to file any objections or answers to this discovery by 27 June 2011.
- On 25 July 2011, appellant filed responses to the Request for Production and to the Requests for Admissions, but no answers to interrogatories were provided.
- The Board ordered appellant to respond to the government's motions to compel by 19 October 2011, but appellant did not respond.
- On 12 January 2012, appellant filed a 'Motion for a 90 Day Stay' citing personal and financial issues.
- The government opposed the stay and requested dismissal for failure to prosecute.
- The Board ultimately denied the government's motion to dismiss.
Parties
- Appellant
- Utility Construction Company, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Contracting Agency
- U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles
- Contract Number
- W912PL-07-D-0044
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.No. 59357, 59358August 29, 2016
- GSC Construction, Inc.No. 59644, 59956, 60069, 60070, 60112, 60113June 21, 2016
- Access Personnel Services, Inc.No. 59900June 15, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
Same Year
- Gray Personnel, Inc.No. 54652, 55833December 31, 2012
- ECC, InternationalNo. 55781December 28, 2012
- DODS, Inc.December 18, 2012
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 57576, 57679December 17, 2012
- TMS Envirocon, Inc.December 12, 2012
- The Public Warehousing CompanyDecember 3, 2012
Same Issue
- First Street Contractors, LLCNo. 64028June 10, 2026
- J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.No. 63378, 64226, 64439June 2, 2026
- Sayar Development Inc.No. 63871, 63894, 64191, 64227March 17, 2026
- American Tattoo Society LLCNo. 64095June 20, 2025
- CKY, INC.No. 60451-EAJAJune 20, 2025
- Zafer Taahhut Insaat Ve TicaretNo. 63737May 27, 2025