Vertex Construction & Engineering
Vertex Construction & Engineering appealed the government's termination of contracts for default and requested equitable adjustments. The Board dismissed the appeals for failure to prosecute.
Material Facts
- The government awarded Vertex Contract No. W56SGK-13-C-7047 on 28 February 2013.
- The contracting officer terminated contract 7047 for default on 14 August 2013.
- Vertex appealed the termination on 1 November 2013, docketed as ASBCA No. 58989.
- The contracting officer denied Vertex's request for an equitable adjustment under contract 7047 on 19 September 2014.
- Vertex appealed the denial on 20 October 2014, docketed as ASBCA No. 59635.
- The government awarded Contract No. W56SGK-13-C-7048 to Vertex on 23 February 2013.
- The contracting officer terminated contract 7048 for default on 13 August 2013.
- Vertex submitted a request for equitable adjustment on 31 August 2013.
- Vertex appealed under contract 7048 on 27 October 2014, docketed as ASBCA No. 59646.
- The government awarded Contract No. W56SGK-13-C-7050 to Vertex on 2 March 2013.
- The contracting officer terminated contract 7050 for default on 14 August 2013.
- Vertex appealed the termination on 1 November 2013, docketed as ASBCA No. 58990.
Parties
- Appellant
- Vertex Construction & Engineering
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Alderman Building Company, Inc.No. 58082May 21, 2020
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Sauer IncorporatedNo. 61790December 18, 2019
- Arab Shah Construction CompanyNo. 61565November 4, 2019
- PIKA-Pirnie JV, LLCNo. 61597November 4, 2019
- Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc.No. 61535July 22, 2019
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- First Street Contractors, LLCNo. 64028June 10, 2026
- J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.No. 63378, 64226, 64439June 2, 2026
- Sayar Development Inc.No. 63871, 63894, 64191, 64227March 17, 2026
- American Tattoo Society LLCNo. 64095June 20, 2025
- CKY, INC.No. 60451-EAJAJune 20, 2025
- Zafer Taahhut Insaat Ve TicaretNo. 63737May 27, 2025