Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd.
Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd. appealed several government motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, which were partially granted and partially denied by the ASBCA.
Material Facts
- The appeals arise under several MATOC contracts for construction services provided in the Republic of Korea.
- Sungwoo initially sought 2,050,656,763 Won under several different theories in ASBCA No. 61219, which was reduced to 669,536,295 Won.
- The claim concerning the CPAR ratings did not seek monetary damages and thus did not require certification.
- The government argued that Mr. Song lacked authority to bind Sungwoo when he certified the claims.
- A power of attorney was submitted retroactively authorizing Mr. Yang to sign and certify the claim.
- The government questioned the authority of Mr. Yang to certify the claim, asserting he lacked authority at the time of certification.
- Appellant filed an appeal on November 24, 2020, after more than 60 days had elapsed since the filing of its claim with no final decision from the contracting officer.
- The government renewed its motion to dismiss all three appeals for lack of jurisdiction on September 21, 2021.
Parties
- Appellant
- Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- Contract No. W91QVN-14-D-0034 et al.
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Government and Military Certification Systems, Inc.No. 64434, 64470August 11, 2026
- Accu-Aire Mechanical, LLCNo. 64204April 29, 2026
- Kallidus TechnologiesNo. 61377, 61976December 18, 2025
- CLC Construction CompanyNo. 59110October 22, 2025
- Enfield Enterprises, Inc.No. 63631April 26, 2024
- Straub Driver, a Joint VentureNo. 61014April 3, 2024
Same Year
- KiewitPhelpsNo. 61184December 30, 2022
- Wright Brothers, the Building Company, Eagle LLCNo. 62285December 30, 2022
- Bhayana Brothers LLCNo. 63377December 23, 2022
- GMA-AVM Joint VentureNo. 63254December 21, 2022
- Global Technical SystemsNo. 63296December 21, 2022
- Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.No. 63182December 16, 2022
Same Issue
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- The Haskell CompanyNo. 64380, 64381May 5, 2026
- Futures, Inc.No. 61566April 16, 2026
- Endure Industries, Inc.No. 64064March 23, 2026
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64309March 2, 2026