611446121962738

Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd.

April 27, 2022Judge McNulty
Partially SustainedContract Formation / ExistenceCDA Jurisdiction

Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd. appealed several government motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, which were partially granted and partially denied by the ASBCA.

Material Facts

  • The appeals arise under several MATOC contracts for construction services provided in the Republic of Korea.
  • Sungwoo initially sought 2,050,656,763 Won under several different theories in ASBCA No. 61219, which was reduced to 669,536,295 Won.
  • The claim concerning the CPAR ratings did not seek monetary damages and thus did not require certification.
  • The government argued that Mr. Song lacked authority to bind Sungwoo when he certified the claims.
  • A power of attorney was submitted retroactively authorizing Mr. Yang to sign and certify the claim.
  • The government questioned the authority of Mr. Yang to certify the claim, asserting he lacked authority at the time of certification.
  • Appellant filed an appeal on November 24, 2020, after more than 60 days had elapsed since the filing of its claim with no final decision from the contracting officer.
  • The government renewed its motion to dismiss all three appeals for lack of jurisdiction on September 21, 2021.

Parties

Appellant
Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
Contract No. W91QVN-14-D-0034 et al.
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.