6244962450

Tetra Tech EC, Inc.

June 8, 2021Judge McNulty
OtherCPARS / Past-Performance EvaluationCDA JurisdictionAuthority of Government AgentsStatutory ComplianceSmall Business

Tetra Tech EC, Inc. challenged the Navy’s performance evaluations for task orders involving radiological investigation and possible remediation at the Hunter Point facility. The Board denied the Navy’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, denied suspension, and granted Tetra Tech’s motion to compel the Rule 4 file.

Material Facts

  • Tetra Tech and the Navy entered into the RAD EMAC, a multiple-award indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract for investigation and possible radiological remediation at the Hunter Point facility.
  • The RAD EMAC had a one-year base period and four one-year option periods, with the last option period expiring on February 23, 2015.
  • The Navy awarded task orders CTO 2, CTO 7, CTO 12, and CTO 15 to Tetra Tech.
  • The task orders required surveys and, if necessary, radiological remediation in accordance with MARSSIM standards and a Base-wide Radiological Work Plan.
  • The Navy and Tetra Tech investigated anomalous soil-sampling data and scan-speed issues, and Tetra Tech performed corrective actions and remedial measures under Navy oversight.
  • The NRC identified two former site workers involved in sampling misconduct and concluded that the misconduct did not involve Tetra Tech management.
  • The Navy initially issued positive CPARS Final evaluations and ratings for Tetra Tech’s work under CTOs 2 and 7 and positive Interim evaluations for CTOs 7 and 12.
  • The Navy later issued negative CPARS Addendum and Final evaluations for the task orders.
  • The contracting officer declined to issue the requested final decisions based on the stated CDA limitation concerning claims involving fraud.
  • Tetra Tech’s complaints challenged the Navy’s compliance with performance-evaluation procedures, including alleged violations of FAR 42.1503 and alleged inaccurate, unfair, arbitrary, and capricious evaluations.

Parties

Appellant
Tetra Tech EC, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Navy
Contracting Agency
Navy
Contract Number
N62473-10-D-0809; N62473-12-D-2006
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.