AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. appealed the denial of its claim arising from work performed for an Energy Savings Performance Contract project. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, holding that AECOM sufficiently alleged a government contract and a tortious breach of contract.
Material Facts
- The government awarded AECOM Contract No. W912DY-15-D-0040 for the design, construction, and operation of energy savings projects.
- The contract was an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity multiple award task order contract involving large and small businesses.
- The government invited AECOM to submit a proposal for an Energy Savings Performance Contract project at Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado.
- The government authorized AECOM to perform preliminary assessment, feasibility-study, design, and price-proposal work for the project.
- The government later decided not to pursue the project and did not plan to exercise its option to obtain ownership of submitted documentation.
- AECOM alleged that the government converted AECOM's energy conservation measure designs and work product for its own use.
- The base contract included an option for the government to obtain ownership of submitted surveys, feasibility studies, designs, and proposals, with consideration for the contractor's effort.
Parties
- Appellant
- AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Contracting Agency
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Contract Number
- W912DY-15-D-0040
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- WEB LLC/WEBCONo. 63676September 23, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64235, 64236September 23, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64199August 4, 2026
- Weil Construction, Inc.No. 62742, 63155, 64045July 29, 2026
Same Year
- Cellular Materials International, Inc.No. 61408December 27, 2021
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61706, 61768December 17, 2021
- Telos CorporationNo. 62950December 16, 2021
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Adjuvant/Capital, LLCNo. 62760December 13, 2021
- Veteran Facility Services, LLCNo. 61855, 61983, 62386December 9, 2021
Same Issue
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- The Haskell CompanyNo. 64380, 64381May 5, 2026
- Futures, Inc.No. 61566April 16, 2026
- Endure Industries, Inc.No. 64064March 23, 2026
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64309March 2, 2026