StructSure Projects, Inc.
StructSure Projects, Inc. appealed a contracting officer's final decision denying its claim for costs associated with temporary phasing facilities. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss the appeal.
Material Facts
- USACE awarded multiple award task order contract No. W9127S-17-D-6004 to StructSure for design-build construction services.
- StructSure's subcontractor for the temporary phasing facilities was Sustainable Modular Management.
- The government issued several notices stating that the task order award was designated non-mission essential.
- StructSure submitted a request for equitable adjustment stating it incurred extended rental costs.
- The agency denied the REA, and StructSure submitted a claim seeking reimbursement for the same costs.
- The claim was certified by C. Kevin Rogers, chief executive officer of StructSure.
- On March 30, 2021, USACE issued a contracting officer's final decision denying the claim.
- StructSure filed a notice of appeal on May 14, 2021, signed by its project manager, Matt Callaway.
- The Board issued an Order on May 20, 2021, directing StructSure to show proper representation.
- Michael S. Alfred, Esq., entered a notice of appearance as counsel for Sustainable Modular Management, which was prosecuting the appeal in the name of StructSure.
Parties
- Appellant
- StructSure Projects, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Contract Number
- W9127S-17-D-6004
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- KiewitPhelpsNo. 61184, 62119, 62980, 64137September 1, 2026
- Hydraulic International, Inc.No. 64332August 17, 2026
- Blackstone Consulting, Inc.No. 64558July 30, 2026
- Potomac Yard ContractorsNo. 63032July 7, 2026
Same Year
- Cellular Materials International, Inc.No. 61408December 27, 2021
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61706, 61768December 17, 2021
- Telos CorporationNo. 62950December 16, 2021
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Adjuvant/Capital, LLCNo. 62760December 13, 2021
- Veteran Facility Services, LLCNo. 61855, 61983, 62386December 9, 2021
Same Issue
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- The Haskell CompanyNo. 64380, 64381May 5, 2026
- Futures, Inc.No. 61566April 16, 2026
- Endure Industries, Inc.No. 64064March 23, 2026
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64309March 2, 2026