63405

Vigor Marine, LLC

September 24, 2026Judge Eyester
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedContract InterpretationContract Changes / Constructive Changes

Vigor Marine, LLC challenged the Navy’s unilateral modification requiring 161 additional days of pierside availability at the CLIN 0054 daily rate. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Board held that CLIN 0054 provided a fixed-price option for 85 days, concluded that the modification changed the contract, granted Vigor’s motion, denied the Navy’s motion, and remanded quantum.

Material Facts

  • The Navy awarded Vigor a fixed-price contract for repair and modernization of the USS Chosin and USS Cape St. George.
  • CLIN 0054 concerned additional pierside days requiring an availability extension for the USS Chosin.
  • The Navy exercised CLIN 0054 at contract award, and the contract documents identified 85 days and a daily pierside rate.
  • FAR 52.217-7 required option exercise in writing no later than final delivery of the vessel and stated that added items would continue at the same rate as like items under the contract unless otherwise agreed.
  • Note E stated that the fully burdened daily rates would be used for negotiating additional dry-dock and pierside performance days in the event of a government-required extension.
  • The Navy and Vigor entered into a modification concerning a 225-day extension, and the modification incorporated Vigor’s extension proposal.
  • Vigor’s extension proposal stated that the final 85 days would be treated as defined in CLIN 0054 and that the remaining 140 days would be priced as outlined in the proposal.
  • The Navy later issued a unilateral modification extending pierside availability by 161 days and applied the CLIN 0054 rate to those days.
  • Vigor’s claim asserted that the Navy could not apply the CLIN 0054 rate to more than 85 days and that additional days required reliance on the changes clause.

Parties

Appellant
Vigor Marine, LLC
Respondent Agency
Department of the Navy
Contracting Agency
Department of the Navy
Contract Number
N00024-19-C-4447
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.