CBCA 1275

Mckissack & Mckissack of D.C.

May 25, 2010Judge DanielsDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Not published in the listingDismissed on other grounds

Key Facts

Appellant
Mckissack & Mckissack of D.C.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 1275
Decided
May 25, 2010The decision states May 25, 2010 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Huddles Jones Sorteberg & Dachille, P.C.
Outcome
Dismissed on other grounds
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from that line, because the decision's text states no operative ruling we could isolate. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Roger C. Jones and Nicole L. Campbell
Huddles Jones Sorteberg & Dachille, P.C.
Columbia, MD
For the respondent
Emily E. Parkhurst and James L. Weiner
Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,669 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided May 25, 2010 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: May 25, 2010

CBCA 1275

McKISSACK & McKISSACK OF D.C.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Roger C. Jones and Nicole L. Campbell of Huddles Jones Sorteberg & Dachille, P.C., Columbia, MD, counsel for Appellant.

Emily E. Parkhurst and James L. Weiner, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

McKissack & McKissack of D.C. (McKissack) rehabilitated the Lincoln Memorial Circle and approaches to the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., under a contract with the Department of the Interior’s National Park Service.

During performance of this contract, numerous disputes arose between the parties.

Some of them were resolved through modifications to the contract. As to others, McKissack submitted to the contracting officer a certified claim in the amount of $4,545,436. The contracting officer denied the claim in its entirety, and McKissack appealed her decision. __________________________________

2 CBCA 1275

After a lengthy mediation conducted by Board Judge Allan H. Goodman, the parties agreed to settle the case, with the agency to pay the contractor $2,600,000 in exchange for the release, waiver, and discharge of “all claims or obligations which now exist or which may hereafter arise, whether known or unknown, or which have or could have been asserted against the United States as well as its officers and employees, arising out of or resulting from the Contract.”

McKissack has now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.

The motion is granted. The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Mckissack & Mckissack of D.C., CBCA 1275. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.