CBCA 5546

Chapman Freeborn Airchartering, Inc.

Jun 23, 2017Judge DanielsAGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
DismissalSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Chapman Freeborn Airchartering, Inc.
Respondent agency
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 5546
Decided
Jun 23, 2017The decision states Jun 23, 2017 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
Holland & Knight LLP, Holland & Knight, LLP
Outcome
Settled
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Matthew P. Vafidis
Holland & Knight, LLP
San Francisco, CA
For the appellant
David S. Black
Holland & Knight LLP
Tysons, VA
For the respondent
R. René Dupuy
Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International Development
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 955 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jun 23, 2017 on its own faceRespondent AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 23, 2017

CBCA 5546

CHAPMAN FREEBORN AIRCHARTERING, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,

Respondent.

Matthew P. Vafidis of Holland & Knight, LLP, San Francisco, CA; and David S.

Black of Holland & Knight LLP, Tysons, VA, counsel for Appellant.

R. René Dupuy, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for International

Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Order

Chapman Freeborn Airchartering, Inc. appealed the decision of an Agency for International Development contracting officer denying the contractor’s claim for $648,364 as compensation for the cancellation of a contract for aviation services. The parties have resolved their differences through mediation conducted by Board Judge Allan H. Goodman and have jointly moved for dismissal of the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_________________________

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Chapman Freeborn Airchartering, Inc., CBCA 5546. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.