CBCA 1407, 1408

C & R Environmental Associates, Inc.

Feb 10, 2009Judge DanielsSOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingWithdrawn

Key Facts

Appellant
C & R Environmental Associates, Inc.
Respondent agency
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 1407, 1408This cell names 2 dockets: 1407, 1408.
Decided
Feb 10, 2009The decision states Feb 10, 2009 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Miles & Stockbridge P.C.
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Alfred M. Wurglitz and Nathaniel D. Hartland
Miles & Stockbridge P.C.
Rockville, MD
For the respondent
Ellen Rothschild and Uri Ko
Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration
Baltimore, MD
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 936 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Feb 10, 2009 on its own faceRespondent SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED: February 10, 2009

CBCA 1407, 1408

C & R ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

Alfred M. Wurglitz and Nathaniel D. Hartland of Miles & Stockbridge P.C.,

Rockville, MD, counsel for Appellant.

Ellen Rothschild and Uri Ko, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security

Administration, Baltimore, MD, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Order

Appellant, C&R Environmental Associates, Inc., appealed a contracting officer’s August 22, 2008, decision which terminated appellant’s 2003 contract for default. In the same decision, the contracting officer terminated appellant’s 2008 contract for cause. The Board docketed the appeals as CBCA 1407 and 1408, respectively.

__________________________________

2 CBCA 1407, 1408

On February 10, 2009, appellant asked the Board to dismiss the appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED.

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in C & R Environmental Associates, Inc., CBCA 1407, 1408. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.