DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: July 9, 2009
CBCA 1509
HOUCK LIMITED,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Chad A. Readler and Grant W. Garber of Jones Day, Columbus, OH, counsel for
Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
William R. Korth, Lynn T. Burleson, Phil Kauffman, and Phillipa L. Anderson, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
Order
Houck Limited appealed a decision of a Department of Veterans Affairs contracting officer regarding the interpretation of a payment provision in a contract for the provision of vocational rehabilitation and employment services to veterans with service-connected disabilities. The parties have now settled their dispute, and the contractor has moved to dismiss its appeal with prejudice.
_________________________
2 CBCA 1509
Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Houck Limited, CBCA 1509. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.