DISMISSED: September 4, 2009
CBCA 1655
XEROX CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Donald J. Walsh of Offit Kurman, P.A., Owings Mills, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Kenneth W. Dodds, Office of the General Counsel, Small Business Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
Order
Xerox Corporation filed an appeal against a Small Business Administration contracting officer’s failure to issue a decision on a claim for selling, leasing, and maintaining various duplicating machines. Appellant sought damages in the amount of $59,328.
On September 2, 2009, appellant filed a consent motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellant states that the parties have settled the claim and requests that the appeal be dismissed.
_______________________________
2 CBCA 1655
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Xerox Corporation, CBCA 1655. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.