CBCA 1879

DLT Solutions, LLC

Oct 7, 2010Judge DanielsDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Not published in the listingGranted

Key Facts

Appellant
DLT Solutions, LLC
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 1879
Decided
Oct 7, 2010The decision states Oct 7, 2010 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Doyle & Bachman, LLP
Outcome
Granted
Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Scott W. Woehr and Ron R. Hutchinson
Doyle & Bachman, LLP
Arlington, VA
For the respondent
Heather M. Self
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,227 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Oct 7, 2010 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

4 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Other statutes1
Agency FAR supplements1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED: October 7, 2010

CBCA 1879

DLT SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

Scott W. Woehr and Ron R. Hutchinson of Doyle & Bachman, LLP, Arlington, VA,

counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Heather M. Self, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), VERGILIO, and GOODMAN.

DANIELS, Board Judge.

The Forest Service (FS), an agency of the Department of Agriculture, placed a delivery order with DLT Solutions, LLC (DLT), under DLT’s General Services Administration schedule contract for lease-to-own of Oracle software licenses. FS chose not to exercise its option to continue the order. DLT then submitted a claim to the FS contracting officer, alleging breach of the contract’s “best efforts” clause and demanding payment of $1,053,000 plus interest. DLT later filed this appeal of the contracting officer’s deemed denial of the claim.

_________________________

_________________________ _________________________

2 CBCA 1879

The parties have now asked the Board, pursuant to our Rule 25(b) (48 CFR 6101.25(b) (2009)), to grant the appeal, adopting the parties’ stipulation that FS shall pay to DLT $1,053,000 plus interest calculated at rates prescribed for amounts due contractors on claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. § 611 (2006). The stipulation provides that interest shall run from the date the claim was submitted to the contracting officer, December 3, 2009, until payment of the principal amount is made. The parties state that they will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, a Board decision which makes such an award, and they will not appeal such a decision.

Decision

Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED. The Forest Service shall pay to DLT Solutions, LLC, the sum of $1,053,000 plus interest at rates prescribed for amounts due contractors on claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978. Interest shall run from December 3, 2009, until payment of the principal amount is made. Payment shall be made from the permanent indefinite judgment fund. 31 U.S.C. § 1304.

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

We concur:

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in DLT Solutions, LLC, CBCA 1879. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.