DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: June 18, 2010
CBCA 1944
PATRICK (PENGCHENG) FU,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Eric A. Seitz, Honolulu, HI, counsel for Appellant.
Kimberly J. Graber, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Energy, Golden, CO, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
Order
The Department of Energy contracted with Dr. Patrick (Pengcheng) Fu to serve as an expert in the Biomass Integrated Biorefinery Merit Review process. The agency terminated the contract for its convenience. Dr. Fu claimed entitlement to $9187.20 in costs of services he provided and expenses he incurred under the contract prior to the termination. After the contracting officer failed to issue a decision on this claim, Dr. Fu appealed from her deemed denial of the claim.
On June 17, 2010, the parties moved the Board to dismiss the underlying appeal with prejudice, stating that they have settled the dispute.
__________________________________
2 CBCA 1944
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Patrick (Pengcheng) Fu, CBCA 1944. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.