DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 22, 2012
CBCA 2102
MURRAY-BENJAMIN ELECTRIC CO., L.P.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
William R. Hinchman and William J. Clements of Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg
LLP, Philadelphia, PA, counsel for Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Nathan C. Guerrero, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
Order
On August 3, 2010, the Board received a notice of appeal from Murray-Benjamin Electric Co., L.P. (contractor) concerning its multiple award schedule contract, GS-35F 0088N, with the General Services Administration (agency). Following an audit and concerns about the price reduction clause, a contracting officer determined that the contractor was required to repay the agency $364,562.12. The contractor timely pursued relief at this Board. 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 7101-7109 (West 2011). On February 21, 2012, the Board received from the parties a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice; the parties have settled their dispute. The Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Murray-Benjamin Electric Co., L.P., CBCA 2102. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.