CBCA 3038

Edmond Computer Corporation

Dec 18, 2012Judge SheridanDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Edmond Computer Corporation
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Judge
Sheridan
Case number
CBCA 3038
Decided
Dec 18, 2012The decision states Dec 18, 2012 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Doyle & Bachman, LLP
Outcome
Settled
Accordingly, CBCA 3038 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Ron R. Hutchinson
Doyle & Bachman, LLP
Arlington, VA
For the respondent
David Godwin and Richard M. Sudder
Office of General Counsel, Department of Justice
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 720 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Dec 18, 2012 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 18, 2012

CBCA 3038

EDMOND COMPUTER CORPORATION,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Ron R. Hutchinson of Doyle & Bachman, LLP, Arlington, VA, counsel for Appellant. David Godwin and Richard M. Sudder, Office of General Counsel, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

SHERIDAN, Board Judge.

Order

On December 13, 2012, representing that they had amicably resolved the matters in controversy through a negotiated settlement, the parties submitted a joint motion requesting that the Board enter an order dismissing this appeal with prejudice. Accordingly, CBCA 3038 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_________________________________

PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Edmond Computer Corporation, CBCA 3038. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.