DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 21, 2012
CBCA 2264
CLARK/HUNT, A JOINT VENTURE--NEVADA,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Benjamin R. Trachtman of Trachtman & Trachtman, Mission Viejo, CA, counsel for
Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Anna C. Maddan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
Order
On January 13, 2011, the Board received from Clark/Hunt, A Joint Venture--Nevada (contractor) a notice of appeal, docketed as CBCA 2264, concerning a denial of its claim arising under a contract, VA101CFM-C-003, with the Department of Veterans Affairs (agency). In particular, the contractor seeks $715,981, said to represent the additional costs it incurred when the Government did not accept “equal” lighting fixtures in lieu of brand name products. The parties resolved questions of entitlement and quantum. On February 21, 2012, the Board received notice that the parties have resolved the dispute, such that the contractor seeks a dismissal with prejudice. Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this appeal.
JOSEPH A. VERGILIO
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Clark/Hunt, a Joint Venture--Nevada, CBCA 2264. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.