CBCA 2271, 2272

Ruby Investments, Inc

Dec 15, 2011Judge DanielsGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Ruby Investments, Inc
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 2271, 2272This cell names 2 dockets: 2271, 2272.
Decided
Dec 15, 2011The decision states Dec 15, 2011 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from that line, because the decision's text states no operative ruling we could isolate. No model is involved.

Topics

Real property leases

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Derrick Chang
Ruby Investments, Inc.
Anchorage, AK
For the respondent
Richard O. Hughes
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,307 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Dec 15, 2011 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: December 15, 2011

CBCA 2271, 2272

RUBY INVESTMENTS, INC,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Derrick Chang, Vice President of Ruby Investments, Inc., Anchorage, AK, appearing for Appellant.

Richard O. Hughes, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

Order

The General Services Administration (GSA) leased from Ruby Investments, Inc.

(Ruby) space in a building owned by Ruby in Anchorage, Alaska. Ruby claimed that it built out the space on an expedited basis, at GSA’s direction, and in so doing incurred costs which it would not have incurred had the agency not given the direction. Ruby demanded payment of $10,769.69 under the lease for one portion of the building and $20,536.28 under the lease for another portion. The contracting officer denied both claims, and Ruby appealed from his decisions.

__________________________________

2 CBCA 2271, 2272

The parties have reached a voluntary settlement in both of the cases, and Ruby has received the agreed-upon payment from GSA. Ruby has now asked that the cases be closed and removed from the Board’s docket.

Accordingly, the Board DISMISSES THE CASES WITH PREJUDICE to their reinstatement.

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Ruby Investments, Inc, CBCA 2271, 2272. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.