DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 20, 2012
CBCA 2573
ePLUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
James E. McCollum, Jr. of McCollum & Associates, LLC, College Park, MD, counsel for Appellant.
Maureen Duignan and Frank Inserra, Office of General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
Order
On November 19, 2012, representing that they had amicably resolved the matters in controversy through a negotiated settlement, the parties submitted a joint motion requesting that the Board enter an order dismissing this appeal with prejudice. Accordingly, CBCA 2573 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in ePlus Technology, Inc., CBCA 2573. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.